速報APP / 工具 / Igloovote Secure Online Voting

Igloovote Secure Online Voting

價格:免費

更新日期:2015-10-31

檔案大小:因裝置而異

目前版本:因裝置而異

版本需求:Android 因裝置而異

官方網站:http://www.igloovote.com

Email:info@igloovote.com

聯絡地址:隱私權政策

Igloovote Secure Online Voting(圖1)-速報App

Imagine that there is an election in Barcelona and there are 1 million people called to vote.

Igloovote Secure Online Voting(圖2)-速報App

The average cost per vote in the western countries is $6 per vote. That means that the cost of this election would be $6M.

Igloovote Secure Online Voting(圖3)-速報App

Here at Igloovote we think that these $6M represent unnecessary sunk costs. Personally we want our political representatives to listen more often to the will of the majority by using direct democracy. Therefore we have patented a technology that makes it possible to vote on the Internet for a fraction of that current cost of $6 per vote.

Igloovote Secure Online Voting(圖4)-速報App

The Igloovote technology is inspired by the Bitcoin concept of using a distributed architecture. The vote is anonym and doesn’t require any human supervision. It is as safe as Bitcoin and you only need a modern device, like a smartphone, to vote.

Igloovote Secure Online Voting(圖5)-速報App

Igloovote is a mix of the advantages of traditional voting systems and online voting systems. The main advantage of traditional voting systems is that security relies in multiple points of failure. If a polling place is compromised, only the votes of that polling place are compromised. Organizing an attack against all polling places is unthinkable.

Igloovote Secure Online Voting(圖6)-速報App

The main idea behind Igloovote is making distributed elections, with a lot of points of failure needed to compromise an election. Non-surprisingly Internet is a great tool for achieving that. In fact, the use of Internet permits elections to rely on a lot more points of failure. You don’t need a point of failure for every few thousand voters. You can even have a point of failure for every 10 or 20 voters. So, there isn’t a central point of failure that needs special security measures.

The fact that you can have a reduced number of voters for every point of failure makes possible checking results on randomly selected points of failure.